|
The Challenge
This financial services firm had a wide variety of products. These
products could have been originated by them or purchased from other
financial institutions. These products had different statuses (e.g.,
current, delinquent, default, resale). As the industry was becoming more
competitive, some national players were focusing on these products, and the
government was negatively impacting rates, this financial institution needed
to better understand their costs by product, status, and source to assist
them with:
- determining strategy
- making purchasing decisions
- managing performance
The Approach
We met with senior management to determine specifically the type of improved
costing information that was needed. Employees from cost centers in two
locations attended one or two workshops. In these workshops, the employees were
given a brief explanation of why the company needed more accurate costing
information and what was expected from them. The employees were asked to define
their activities. They were asked to either do time studies or estimate what
percentage of their time was spent for each activity. Then they were asked to
determine how to assign these activities to the various cost objects (i.e.
products, source, and status).
This information was loaded into ABC Technologies OROS activity costing
package where we were able to extend the capabilities of the software to meet
the clients needs by working closely with ABC Technologies.
The Result
As a result of this information, it became apparent that some processes were
more expensive than everyone thought. It also gave insights into which products
were profitable and which were not. This helped marketing to make pricing
decisions when buying loans from other financial institutions. It also helped
management better understand that as the ration of loans in different statuses
changed, the cost of servicing loans will increase or decrease. It served as a
benchmark for comparing results across locations. When the organization decided
to consolidate the number of locations that were performing an activity, this
information helped them assign activities to those locations with the lowest
cost for a particular activity.
Activity Based Management (ABM) for
Helping Service Company Better Understand Their Costs
The Challenge
This $500 million plus service organization wanted to better understand the
cost of the various services that they were providing to their customers. They
were spending millions of dollars on reengineering and did not know what their
"as is" and "should be" costs were.
The Approach
This very successful international service organization was providing service
without understanding very well the cost of the various services that they were
providing. They were spending millions of dollars on reengineering without
knowing what those services cost prior to reengineering. We started with the
call center and accounting areas. In the accounting areas, we asked everyone to
define their activities and estimate the time they spent on those activities. In
the call center, we listened to calls recorded by quality to determine the
effectiveness of the customer service representative. Calls ranged from 2
minutes to 30 minutes depending on the caller, the customer service
representative, and the purpose of the call. We interviewed training,
telemarketing supervisors and senior management.
The Result
As a result of our approach, we were able to collect some very useful "as is"
information that could be used to compare to the "future state" that would
result from the very expensive reengineering effort. In addition, the managers
of the area could now better understand not only the times, but also the costs
of various activities that they sponsored. This information could be used in
deciding whether to approve a major computer system that had little cost
savings, but was supposed to improve customer service.
This information was used when the owner of this privately held company
decided to sell to a publicly traded organization for estate planning purposes.
Activity Based Costing (ABC) to Determine How
Much Does It Cost to Service Different Customers? How to Better Price Products
and Services?
The Challenge
This company provided back room leasing services to large money-centered
banks. Their customers were household names. When a customer called the bank
about their lease, they were actually talking to this organization. The
organization did everything from processing monthly lease payments, collecting
and paying property tax and insurance, making collection calls, and taking
necessary legal action to repossess assets that were in default. The problem was
the organization did not understand how much each of these services cost. Also,
their customers wanted their invoices billed to them as a monthly charge in the
form of so many dollars per lease. This meant that customer one may only want
monthly processing of lease payments and delinquency calls. Monthly lease
payments occurred every month, but delinquency calls were only to delinquent
lessors. Customer two might want processing of insurance and legal action to
regain property from defaulted lessors. Insurance and property are an annual or
semi-annual charge while regaining property from defaulted lessors occurs only
if they default. Yet both customers wanted their invoice in the form of a
monthly charge per lease rather than in the form of a charge per insurance
payment.
The Approach
We started with a two-day workshop with a cross section of people from
marketing, finance, and each of the areas of marketing. The president attended
the morning portion of the training, and he read our book on Activity-Based
Management for Service Industries, Government, and Nonprofit Entities. He
supported the ABM effort through-out. We facilitated workshops for each area
including marketing, sales, accounting, insurance, property tax, collections,
and regaining the property. We calculated the cost of performing these various
activities. The results were used to develop a pricing model.
The Result
After talking with marketing and sales, the president and marketing decided
that the invoice would still be in the form of so many dollars per month per
lessor. However, the monthly invoice would be derived by calculating the unit
cost of each separate service (e.g., pay insurance, make collection calls)
multiplied by the expected number of times that service was going to be
performed. This answer would be summed for all services to obtain a total annual
cost. The monthly charge per lessor would be derived calculating the total
charges for each customer and then dividing by the total monthly customers for
the year. This approach gave the customer an invoice in the form they wanted.
This approach helped the organization better understand their costs by service
provides as well as by customer which enabled them to focus their marketing to
those types of customers and those services that were most profitable.
Activity Based Costing in Social
Services Agencies
The Challenge
A group of social services agencies was facing reduced reimbursement rates
while costs were increasing. They were being asked to provide additional
services without additional compensation. Private industry was beginning to
provide services that these agencies provided. Many of these agencies were small
with revenue of only $1-$20 million.
The Approach
We were chosen over a Big-Six firm because of our experience, our approach,
and our price. We worked with a trade association that put together a pilot
consisting of 8 different social service agencies. The agencies had to
contribute something, but not the full cost of the study. This project was
considered so important that the trade association took the balance of our fees
from their reserves. The agencies listened to our presentation and competed to
participate in the pilot. The eight agencies represented a cross section of size
(i.e., small, medium, and large) plus a cross section of social services
provided to consumers. These services consisted of transportation, vocational,
clinical, day rehabilitation, case management, support services, recreation, and
education. The pilot consisted of costing 80% of the total cost of an agency and
included intake, billing, and human resources.
A one-day workshop for the pilot with representatives form each of the 8
agencies defined activities for the main services the various agencies and for
intake, human resources, and billing. Then the representatives went back to
their agencies and ask a sample of employees what percentage of time was spent
on each of their activities for the last year. We worked with each of the pilot
agencies. They spread non-salary expenses such as phone, computers, and rent to
these various activities. They divided their activity costs by the total output
volume for each activity to derive activity unit costs. Finally they assigned
these activity unit costs to the various services their agencies provided.
The Result
This enables the agencies to better understand the costs of each of their
activities. It also helped them understand the total cost of providing different
services. They were able to separate the cost of services from reimbursement
methods. This was an extremely complicated model because the agencies could
perform the same activity for two people yet be reimbursed different amounts
because the two people came in under different programs. They could have a
program where they were reimbursed from two sources for the same activity. For
example, if they provided supervised janitorial services for people who had
development disabilities, they could be reimbursed as part of the janitorial
contract as well as being reimbursed as part of a social services program. This
costing information helped them to remain competitive and make better decisions.
Activity Based Costing (ABC) When Internal
Customers Complaining They Don't Understand IT Charges and Felt IT Charges Were
Too High
The Challenge
A $10 billion service firm had internal customers who were complaining that
they did not understand their charges from IT. They felt the charges were too
high, and the services provided by IT couldn't possibly cost that much. They had
recently outsourced their help desk, but help desk charges were continuing to
escalate. They had purchased a faster mainframe that processed faster, but their
cost per CPU minute was increasing. Customers were complaining. They has a work
ticket system for handling help desk calls, but this was not being utilized to
the fullest.
The Approach
Our approach was to help them better understand their costs. First we worked
with the area that managed the system for the recording, analyzing, and
reporting on their work tickets. We determined all the various activities that
were involved in managing such a system. Their activities consisted of: setting
up new employees and changing employees connection; answering questions
concerning the work ticket software as well as questions concerning the network
and printers, customizing the work ticket system reports; updating the Oracle
database on which the work ticket system rests. A cross section of the group
identified cost drivers (those things that interfere with them doing their job.
They created action plans and defined/refined their performance measures.
The Result
The group determined that by having a list of all the activities that were
involved in maintaining the work ticket system, their internal customers would
better appreciate the cost of providing this service. They estimated the cost of
everyone completing work tickets. They could now add the cost of the department
providing the work ticket system with the cost of the users of the work ticket
system so that everyone would better understand the total cost of such a system.
With this cost information, they can discuss with the users: that not filling
out work tickets completely, the organization does not gain insights into root
causes and frequency of problems so that proper corrective action can be taken.
Heavy users of customization should be charged so that they better understand
the cost they are causing the organization or at least informed how much each
request costs so they can determine if they can justify that costs. The computer
security folks should handle passwords to this system along with all the other
computer passwords. IT training should perform work ticket system training. They
should create a feedback loop between the work ticket system reports and
training so that the work system trainers emphasize those common errors of
users. They need to explore how to better resolve issues crossing areas (e.g.,
printer, password, network, mainframe, application)
Call John Antos at 972-980-7407 to find out how Activity Based
Costing can help you reach your goals and give your peace of mind
| Activity Based Costing A Superior
Costing Tool |
|
Phone: 972.980.7407 email:
john.antos@valuecreationgroup.com
Value Creation Group, Inc.
7820 Scotia Dr. #2000
Dallas, TX 75248
|
|