Activity Based Costing Defined
Activity Based Costing is a subset of ABM. ABC improves costing by tracing
expenses (e.g. salaries, supplies, rent) to activities and tracing activities to
business processes, products, services, customers, distribution channels, etc.
Activity Based Management (ABM)
Defined
.focuses on managing activities/business processes to achieve organizational
objectives.
.reduces cost drivers and non-value and transfers resources to economic value
creating activities/business processes the customer wants and is willing to pay
for.
.Creates performance measures for cost, time, quality, and outcomes so everyone
understands how their activities contribute to the mission and strategy.
. Supports Balanced Scorecard by creating performance measures
. Improves cash flow, quality, cycle time reduction,
. Basis for Business Process Redesign,
. Supports gain sharing /goal sharing, and teams.
Activity Based Costing
Information
We thank Mike Roberts for the following information.
For those new to ABM, this section will introduce you to the world of ABM.
We have provided a vast amount of free material that will enhance your ABM
presentation. This includes The CAM-I Glossary, our fast track Approach and the
ABM Bibliography.
By now you have probably either read or heard success stories about how ABC or
ABM techniques have helped companies better understand product cost and
profitability, identify opportunities or develop improved performance
measurement. What you may not know is that recent studies have shown that 70
percent of ABC/ABM implementations fail! Indeed, some organizations have
achieved great success as a result of their ABM efforts. For these companies,
Activity Based techniques have helped lead management to find ways to
significantly improve bottom line profits and returns.
On the other hand, for many companies, ABM implementation has become a long and
drawn out affair, consuming considerable resources in terms of management time,
consulting fees and software costs. Worse yet, many of these efforts ended as
dismal failures, producing little, if any, tangible benefit.
Why would a web page on ABM begin by describing this high rate of failure?
Because our organization is a different kind of company and we want you to be in
the top 30 percent of successful ABM implementers. More importantly, we're
prepared to help you plan, develop and implement an ABM system tailored to your
company's needs; a system which is practical, produces positive results and
provides a sound basis for continuous improvement. We believe that the success
of any improvement program is largely dependent on three key elements which are
incorporated in every ABM project we undertake.
Designing a practical approach to fit the organization's objectives.
The caliber and experience of people involved in the program
Providing hands-on support to ensure timely execution, measurable results and
ongoing improvement.
Practical, Tailored Solutions
First, we recognize each company has different objectives
and requirements for their ABM System. Even within the same company, different
organizations will commonly have different objectives which should be addressed
through the ABM implementation. ABM should be adapted so it "fits"
with other organizational initiatives such as BPR, TQM and employee empowerment.
Our first objective is to understand your needs and objectives. Only then can we
tailor an implementation approach that is right for your company.
Experts
Secondly, developing the right Activity Based Approach for your company requires
experience. We are highly experienced experts, not just in ABM, but in other
advanced management techniques as well. Our Team is comprised of many of the
leading experts in ABM, who have extensive experience in successfully leading
ABM implementations in a number of different industries. Support
Finally, throughout your ABM implementation, our experts will assist you through
the process. We'll work closely with your team to successfully complete the
implementation and to enhance their understanding of Activity Based Management.
Our goal is to transfer our skill and knowledge to your team so that future ABM
projects can be undertaken with minimal outside support. Take a minute and
review our experience and qualifications. Review fast track Approach we
developed to speed our clients through the ABM process. Finally, contact us so
we can get you on fast track to successful ABM.
We are is a different kind of company. We are an elite coalition of
recognized industry experts in Activity Based Management and Process
Improvement. Every Associate has over twenty years of hands-on industry
experience and each of these experts have successfully lead ABM implementations
for major companies. When you review our team and their credentials, you'll
probably recognize the names of these experts who have helped pioneer ABM. By
working together, we provide an unparalleled level of expertise and support to
our clients. We have extensive experience in the manufacturing, service,
distribution and medical fields.
Approach
Our approach to ABM is different. We developed a fast
track approach to provide clients an accelerated approach and software to ABM
which is both practical and consistently produces measurable results. Our
approach and software is tailored to specific needs of clients and is linkable
to ABM software products.
Our unique approach to ABM implementation combines group techniques, process
mapping and ABC to improve business processes, provide strategic cost data, and
promote continuous improvement. This approach utilizes cross-functional teams to
define outputs and activities, trace cost to activities and products, develop
process maps, define and prioritize improvement opportunities, and build group
consensus on performance measures and process improvement opportunities. This
approach significantly reduces ABM implementation time and allows organization
to rapidly begin realizing measurable results.
Our Results
Our results have been excellent. During these projects
participants typically identified improvement opportunities with first year
payback of 15-20 times the investment in the project. Our approach emphasizes
"learning by doing". This enables the company to develop its own
internal team and eliminates the need for full time outside support.
Next Steps
The information included in this Web site will provide you
with some additional information on our Associates and ABM approach. If you're
serious about implementing a successful Activity Based Management system,
contact us. We will be happy to discuss availability of training, education,
workshops or seminars that are tailored to your organization. We'll be glad to
provide references from our most recent ABM implementations and discuss your
company's ABM needs and objectives.
We have a wealth of experience in ABM processes and work with some of the
biggest companies in the US.
Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Blue Cross Blue Shield, CAM-I, Caterair, Ciba-Corning,
Discover Card, Delta Dental, Ford, GATX, Harris, IBM, J.C. Penney Life, Johnson
& Johnson, JLG Industries, LAM Research, National Semiconductor, Norton,
Racal Datacom, Tredegar Industries, US Air Force, University of Alabama, Zenith
What is difference between Activity Based Costing (ABC) and Activity Based
Management (ABM)?
Activity Based Costing is a technique that was originally developed to improve a
company's understanding of the cost of the products and services it provides.
ABC provides this improved understanding by first tracing resources (operating
costs) to the activities (work) performed within the organization. Secondly,
these activities are traced to the products, services, or customers for whom the
activity is performed. The primary uses of Activity Based Costs tend to be
strategic in nature and include:
Evaluation of product line or customer profitability
Enhancement of make or buy decisions, and
Costing of intra-company services.
Activity Based Management, addresses not only the strategic issues of
profitability of products, customers, or services, but expands the analysis to
understand and define:
Non-value-added activities, Cost drivers, Performance measurements, and
Opportunities to redefine or redesign business processes. ABM provides decision
makers the opportunity to not only assess which products or customers are more
profitable, but defines the opportunities to eliminate waste and improve the
profitability of all products and services.
How does Activity Based Costing differ
from traditional cost accounting systems?
Most traditional costing systems utilize a single basis, (e.g. direct labor)
to distribute the indirect costs to all products and services. This method of
allocating indirect costs commonly results in erroneous cost data. Often
products which have high volume (and high labor cost) are over costed. Likewise,
the cost of lower volume products are often understated, and many of the
indirect costs of these products are overlooked.
Rather than relying on a single basis to distribute costs, ABC assigns costs to
activities and products based on how the costs (resources) are actually consumed
by the process or product. By moving away from traditional cost allocation
methods and using improved ABC methods of tracing and assignment, ABC provides
managers with a clearer picture of cost of processes and the profitability of
customers and products.
How are activities analyzed?
The three most common techniques for defining and
analyzing activities are as follows:
Interviewing
Interview techniques rely on asking an expert on the activity or process
specific questions about the work that is performed within their area. These
interviews are used to determine:
The outputs of the process
The customer for the output
The quality measurement for the output
The activities required to produce the output
The resources consumed by the activities
How the activities add value
The cost drivers of the activities
A series of questions are used during the interview to elicit the required
information.
Group Workshop
Group workshop techniques utilize working sessions with the people who actually
perform the activity, to gather the information noted above. Utilizing work
groups improves understanding of the process, while at the same time helping to
build consensus about the process, activities, and opportunities to make
improvements. Typically these working sessions will include training on how ABC
and ABM are used, as well as specific techniques to define the activities and
build group consensus. Some of the more popular
techniques used in these workshops are:
Nominal Group Technique
Process Mapping
Affinity Diagramming
Story Boarding
Brainstorming
Cause and Effect Analysis (Fishbone Diagramming)
Groups that participate in activity analysis workshop are better prepared to
begin development of plans to implement process improvements that have been
identified. The fast track process developed by Mike Roberts is an excellent
example of using the group workshop technique to perform activity analysis.
Specific Observation
Analyzing activities through specific observation utilizes time-study and other
work measurement techniques to define activities and resources consumed by the
activity. These techniques have disadvantages related to their impact on people
and the work being studied. People tend to behave differently when studied which
can lead to a poor or incorrect definition and analysis of an activity. Specific
observation is best used as a follow on to group analysis to confirm information
provided by the group or to develop more precise data. It should only be used
when the group understands the need for it and there is consensus for using it.
How do you define non-value-added (NVA) activities?
The concept of non-value-added activities is without a doubt the most
controversial issue within ABM. There are a number of definitions in use for NVA;
some of the most common ones are:
NVA Activities are activities that do not contribute to meeting customer
requirements and could be eliminated without degrading the products, service, or
functionality of the business.
NVA Activities are those activities and tasks within activities an informed
customer is not willing to pay for.
NVA is anything other than the absolute minimum of material, machines, and human
power required to add value to the product or service.
Activities that have any of the following words as part of their name or
definition are generally considered to be non-value-added:
Scrap/Rework/Return Materials/Move
Count/Wait/Setup/Inspect
Check/Test/Store/Measure
Mike Roberts has developed the concept of Ownership
Value Added tm (OVA) to help
define those portions of activities that are NVA and assign responsibility for
eliminating the waste. The OVA concept separates the NVA waste into two buckets;
one that can be fixed by operational people and the other that requires
strategic changes that have to come from the top of the business.
What is the relationship between ABM and other improvement techniques such as
Reengineering and Total Quality Management (TQM)? ABM complements Reengineering
and TQM by providing quantified cost data associated with existing processes and
activities, thus enabling intelligent evaluation of process changes and
improvements. Further, ABM can be used effectively to model and measure the
cost/cost savings of redesigned or improved processes that result from TQM and
Reengineering efforts.
What is the difference between Cost Drivers, Resource Drivers and Activity
Drivers?
Here are some definitions of these ABM terms that can sometimes cause confusion.
For more information the CAM-I (Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing
International) Glossary of ABM should be consulted.
Cost Driver - cause of activity and its cost; any factor causes increase or
decrease in occurrence of an activity or level of effort required to perform
activity. There are often several cost drivers for a single activity.
Resource Driver - is the means for tracing the resources that are consumed by a
particular activity to that activity. As an example, when tracing the cost of a
resource such as labor to an activity, the amount of effort to perform that
activity must be identified. Here, the Resource Driver called Headcount or FTE's
is very useful. In the old days, Resource Drivers were called 'first stage
drivers'.
Activity Driver - means for tracing a costed activity to the object consuming
that activity. The object can be a product, a service or a customer, depending
on what you are trying to establish the cost of. For instance, if costed
activity is Assemble Product, and you want to establish product costs, Activity
Driver called Product Volume, might be appropriate. Again, in the old days,
Activity Drivers were called 'second stage drivers'.
What is Activity Based Budgeting?
How does it differ from traditional budgeting techniques? Activity Based
Budgeting (ABB) is a technique for enhancing the accuracy of financial forecasts
and increasing management understanding. When automated, ABB can rapidly and
accurately produce financial plans and models based on varying levels of volume
assumptions. Also, ABB eliminates much of the needless rework created by
traditional budgeting techniques. ABB analyzes the products or services to be
produced, what activities are required to produce those products or services,
and finally what resources need to be budgeted to perform those activities.
Simply said, ABB is the reversing of the ABC process to produce financial plans
and budgets.
What kind of software do I need and what are some of the pitfalls in doing an
ABM pilot project?
The most important element in completing an ABM pilot is how well the activity
analysis is done and the depth of understanding of the ABC/ABM process from the
bottom to the top of the organization. Many organizations will embark on an ABM
pilot by purchasing an expensive piece of software and spending an inordinate
amount of time learning to use the software; time that should be spent during a
pilot on the aforementioned issues. RPM Associates has found that using a
spreadsheet or simple data base product is all that is required during a pilot
project. In fact, we provide Microsoft Access-based software free to our clients
that are embarking on a pilot project. The time to decide on a permanent
software solution is after the pilot is completed and the long term strategy for
using ABM is rolled out.
The duration of a pilot is another important consideration. We have found that
depending on the scope of the area to be piloted, a project should take at least
four weeks and no longer than three months. Pilots that take longer than this
usually lose focus and consume too much of an organization's resources. The
three month time frame is fully adequate to evaluate the benefits of ABM and to
make the decision to go forward.
Developing a solid plan with specific phases and objectives will help avert many
pitfalls. As a minimum, the following phases are suggested:
Project Planning
Preliminary Data Analysis
Team Development
ABM Training
Activity Analysis and Costing
Identification of Process Improvement Opportunities
Project Evaluation and Reporting
Call or email below John Antos at 972-980-7407 to find out
how Activity Based Costing can help you reach your goals and give your peace of mind
|
Up Activity Based Costing Definition Activity Based Costing Example Activity Based Costing Benefits Activity Based Costing Case Study Activity Based Costing Clients Activity Based Feature Costing Activity Based Costing Consulting Activity Based Costing Consultants Activity Based Costing Advantages Disadvantages Activity Based Costing Implementation Activity Based Costing Rapid Prototyping Activity Based Costing Reporting Activity Based Costing Seminars Activity Based Costing Model Activity Based Costing Software Activity Based Costing System Activity Based Costing Training CAM-I Activity Based Costing Articles Activity Based Costing Books OLAP On-Line Analytical Processing Customer Profitability Customer Costs Customer Segmentation Product Profitability Product Costing Service Profitability Service Costing SKU Profitability SKU Costing Activity Based Costing Accounting abc Activity Based Costing Accounting Activity Based Costing Approach Activity Based Costing Time Driven Shared Services Transfer Pricing
|